Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id QAA26977 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 16:40:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQztry26052; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 16:33:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA26532; Mon, 11 Dec 1995 16:33:40 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 16:33:40 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <39@beanbaw.demon.co.uk>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: light2 <light2@beanbaw.demon.co.uk>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Stop Internet Censorship!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>
> Ummm, the only thing that I'm curious about it whether us Canucks
> up here in the frozen wastes have any say in the matter? I'd like to
> express support, but since this Internet Censorship is an American law,
> it's unlikely that American politicians are going to listen
> to non-constituents like us anti-censorship Canadians. (:
Same goes for us in the UK. It may be an American law but it will affect
everyone using the net. :(
If it is passed in the US you can bet our Government will be jumping on the